Possible Picture of Vs that drop in June 09

I’m what many of you would call an “Air Jordan” head. My collection is comprised mostly of overpriced lifestyle J’s from the last two years. (Gentry saved Jordan Brand with that Burgundy Air Jordan 5 (V) reissue, people!) I remember the time I spilled Tahitian Treat on my “DMP” Jordan 11 (XI) like most people remember the birth of their first child, and though I’m too young to recall MJ’s exploits on the ‘wood, I feel good being part of this whole sneaker culture thing and wearing kicks that everyone already has. When I’m not buying Jordans, I really enjoy speculating about which pair(s) are next to release. Earlier today on NikeTalk, rumors were running rampant about this pair of Jordan 5 (V) that are supposed to release this coming June. The shoe features a predominantly white patent upper, cocoa midsole, and flesh-colored tongue. In my world, this is a recipe for deliciousness, baby!

Air Jordan V (5) - Possible June 2009 Release

Air Jordan V (5) - Possible June 2009 Release

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. F*** this kis, if you werent around for when jordan was playin basketball your not a jordan head collect all you want ya tool bag!!!

  2. cocoa midsole + mostly patent upper + flesh coloured tongue = fkn ugly/disgraceful/never ever on my feet.

  3. All three of those sneakers are tough. But I wanted to know if you had any info on the white/red and black/red 12s that are scheduled to release in November 2009.

  4. Dude if you have mostly jordan lifestyle releases from the past two years you are not a jordan head, you are a hypebeast. There have been next to zero good releases from jordan: lifestyle, gr, limited gr, etc. over the last two years. Damn, sneakerfiles, your writers absolutely suck. Call me up if you need a good writer. Note the correct usage of the colon up there for proof. Look it up.

  5. Whoever wrote this article, seriously sounds unprofessional and immature. I hate you sneakerfiles

  6. wow! the f***ing article is fake u retards. u all just seriously really pissed me off, ever heard of sarcasm?? those 5s are bs, u all know it. 13 in roman numerals is XIII, not VIII, AND THE AIR JORDAN 2009 IS NOT CALLED THE TWENTY F***ING FOURS!!!!


  8. Do us all a favor and STOP calling yourself a Jordan head you preppy bastard….."SAVED BJ WITH THE BURGUNDY'S"!!! You have no idea what you're talking about…..that loser ruined the brand….go cop some OG's and some Jordan and Bulls DVDs and learn yourself about what MAN was all about.

  9. Commenters on a sneaker forum accusing someone else of lifestyl'n? LOL!

    (And learn to recognize sarcasm some day. It's an important part of reading skills.)

  10. noob!!! @ article writer… that means the last 2 years you have fusions and packs… get real cuz…..

  11. Those 5s r garbage cant nothing top the first DMP Package and the raging bulls ugly too diappointing

  12. YOU GUYS ARE ALL IDIOTS, hes being frickin sarcastic lean how to read and infer, unless you dropped out after elementary school.

    "I feel good being part of this whole sneaker culture thing and wearing kicks that everyone already has. When I’m not buying Jordans, I really enjoy speculating about which pair(s) are next to release."

    can you not sense the sarcasm, also when he said he bought ever OVERPRICED lifestyle release from the past two years does that not sound like sarcasm

  13. again, who wrote this… haha. even if it was an attempt at sarcasm, it was very poorly done.

  14. tell jordan he should relase all original colors from 1's-23's….

    them 5's coming up later in the year are lame

    some of these colors look ugly

  15. You can't have the same colorways for years and expect to gain new Jordan customers, YES Jordan Brand wants to expand their consumer base to more then just JORDAN LOYALISTS who only want ''og'' colors. I agree with most of you and most of what you're saying about a lot of the fusions and SOME questionable choices of colors lately, but these aren't bad, definitely not classics, but aren't bad. Also, I don't think the writer of this article was using as much sarcasm as someone on this post suggested. There was some sarcasm used, but very poorly executed. The writer should know his/her audience and go from there. With most of the comments here murdering the English language at Larry Holmes type pace, he should have known to keep things simple. Whoever reads my post, might have a seizure from reading so much at once, ''ya mothers an idiot''. That summed up what I said about the audience. Their mother's aren't idiots at all….that would be a step up and an insult to idiots everywhere. These kicks get a 7/10.