Comments on: Converse Jack Purcell LTT http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2009/03/09/converse-jack-purcell-ltt/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:59:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: sneakerdude90 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2009/03/09/converse-jack-purcell-ltt/comment-page-1/#comment-280289 sneakerdude90 Tue, 10 Mar 2009 02:27:09 +0000 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/?p=54601#comment-280289 DOOOOPPPPEEE DOOOOPPPPEEE

]]> By: rick http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2009/03/09/converse-jack-purcell-ltt/comment-page-1/#comment-280390 rick Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:56:36 +0000 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/?p=54601#comment-280390 white ones are crack white ones are crack

]]> By: wsjones1981 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2009/03/09/converse-jack-purcell-ltt/comment-page-1/#comment-280343 wsjones1981 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:15:20 +0000 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/?p=54601#comment-280343 Both are tight, however, defintely feeling the whites more to rock with khakis. Both are tight, however, defintely feeling the whites more to rock with khakis.

]]>