Comments on: Wood Wood x Converse 1HUND(RED) Chuck Taylor http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2008/09/16/wood-wood-x-converse-1hundred-chuck-taylor/ Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:41:09 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Dalton Sykes http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2008/09/16/wood-wood-x-converse-1hundred-chuck-taylor/#comment-202126 Dalton Sykes Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:23:12 +0000 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/?p=27837#comment-202126 You should give them custom tagging, since they should lead you to more profitable trades. - It's not fussy about RED. Likewise, other details also applies. You should give them custom tagging, since they should lead you to more profitable trades. – It’s not fussy about RED. Likewise, other details also applies.

]]> By: sopgent7 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2008/09/16/wood-wood-x-converse-1hundred-chuck-taylor/#comment-201558 sopgent7 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:20:28 +0000 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/?p=27837#comment-201558 man these are nice.. man these are nice..

]]> By: Snekcrew http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2008/09/16/wood-wood-x-converse-1hundred-chuck-taylor/#comment-201259 Snekcrew Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:09:02 +0000 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/?p=27837#comment-201259 Oh yes they are... Oh yes they are…

]]> By: Claus Bruun http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2008/09/16/wood-wood-x-converse-1hundred-chuck-taylor/#comment-201192 Claus Bruun Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:10:45 +0000 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/?p=27837#comment-201192 Isnt "Wood Wood" danish? http://www.woodwood.dk/ Isnt “Wood Wood” danish?
http://www.woodwood.dk/

]]> By: K2 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/2008/09/16/wood-wood-x-converse-1hundred-chuck-taylor/#comment-201145 K2 Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:11:14 +0000 http://www.sneakerfiles.com/?p=27837#comment-201145 FIRST! The limited edition Chucks are typically sick... No surprise here. FIRST!

The limited edition Chucks are typically sick… No surprise here.

]]>