Comments on: Nike Zoom BB II Low Trash Talk Steve Nash

By: King

King — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:58:03 +0000

I was going to say the same. Even if it’s just for their image, it’s still good that they’re recycling.

By: Nene33

Nene33 — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:35:10 +0000

Of course it’s about image, but it doesn’t matter why they do it, as long as they do it.

By: mr. poop

mr. poop — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:02:33 +0000

yes frf a;ofhp;aophfp;aohfunfvdjnfvhgdjsksbfgdkjbg

By: frf

frf — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:06:48 +0000

bhbhbhogvgcvgxtyfgdcfvbnwdfghjzxcvbnm,dcfvbncvbnmfghjkyuioplkkjjhggzxccvbnsnddddddddddmdddhdudbdgdvfddb dsdcscs s zsbnhs dsuhgegewfewxgrerehexcr rt yftr utdrrcujtdctydry km

By: brian

brian — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:02:40 +0000

the name is perfect trash

By: TechNutt

TechNutt — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:43:33 +0000

Chinky I’d said
am February 15 2008 @ 5:34 am

“They only doing this for their public image like all other ‘environmentally friendly’ firms do.”

^^Cosign^^

It’s all about company image. I’m glad Nike made the changes, but I’m sure the concept was developed mainly for “CYA” reasons (Cover your ass) rather than “environmental” excuses.

Honestly, I give more props to Nike for making anatomically correct shoes for the feet of Native Americans than something so generic and cliche’ such as this.

By: mr. poop

mr. poop — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:18:00 +0000

no you people are stupid retards.
fight me losers thes shoe are lame i stic to my k mart shoes
’sdljkf’aj’ajfg’ajklf’kfls’

butt