New Air Jordan Spizike Concept or Another Fake?

50 Responses for "New Air Jordan Spizike Concept or Another Fake?"

1. Name June 1st, 2007 at 10:36 pm

   too ugly to b real and if those are the 23 ewwww

2. oklai19 June 1st, 2007 at 10:37 pm

   that shoes is not the jordan brand’s product,that brand is Beijing Qiaodan~

3. HYPHY101 June 1st, 2007 at 10:42 pm

   fluckin ugly kuzz

4. moosecow417 June 1st, 2007 at 10:58 pm

   gotta be fake

5. Clinton June 1st, 2007 at 10:59 pm

   I don’t know why you would think that would be the Air Jordan 23. But those can’t be real, they’re too weird and ugly looking. And the 23’s aren’t going to release until, I would guess, 2/17/08.

6. chris June 1st, 2007 at 11:12 pm

   ummm, these should be in tha trash, even if theyre not jordans, u could scare or even kill someone for them shoes being so hideous lmao

7. 754boy June 2nd, 2007 at 12:02 am

   Look like fakes to me. Ironically, they look BETTER than the god awful Spiz’ikes LOL!!!

8. ILoveJs June 2nd, 2007 at 12:26 am

   Is this a serious post?

9. Dubsta June 2nd, 2007 at 1:43 am

   wow those are awesome, i hope those release so i can cop’em. haha. jk. those are soooooooooo ugly. definitly a concept or fake i really don’t care cuz it is garbage

10. Stay Fly Fresh Kicks June 2nd, 2007 at 4:00 am

    Those might be Air Jordans because all the latest sneakers that cam out like the 21’s and 22’s is staight ugly jordan need to step up his get and get back to is old school style and stop letting white people make his shoes or pick em LOL LOL LOL LMAO

11. wtf June 2nd, 2007 at 5:09 am

    LOL you got that right

12. steelo June 2nd, 2007 at 10:39 am

    ew.

13. SUN15 June 2nd, 2007 at 11:49 am

    concept of the nest building?

14. Sneaks101 June 2nd, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    Stay Fly Fresh Kicks if it was’nt for that white man Tinker Hatfield, Nike and Jordan Brand would be finished. You sound more of a hypebeast if anything. If your gonna by the product at least know your history besides what seasons or events the shoes where worn.

15. Jaxonian June 2nd, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    gross.

16. JORDAN_KING June 2nd, 2007 at 5:55 pm

    2 UGLY I HOPE THEY FAKE CUZ I DONT WANNA C THEM N STORES

17. WEezy BabY June 2nd, 2007 at 7:34 pm

    THey look hella cheap

18. EdgebrookSole June 2nd, 2007 at 8:33 pm

    100% FAKE these cant be real or even think about letting this shoe be a concept!!!!!!!!!!

19. PaPa jUst Peed on yo Steez June 2nd, 2007 at 10:42 pm

    Demz iz da Hadfields sonz, Iz Ima copem all day on Sundayz. I wuv my kikz dat I juzt gots frum da house in Philly afta I gots my cheezsteeks. Yumm, deez iz tasteir dan McDonaldz and azz real az dem Spizzies I gotz from my manz i just conversated wit over at Nike, only he couldn’t understand me cuz I talk like I write.

20. A30 June 2nd, 2007 at 11:32 pm

    soo fake

21. B!0hzrd June 3rd, 2007 at 2:34 am

    yeah everybody stfu about race in the sneaker world. everybody runnin around saying white people are bad for nike, im down with everyone saying that gentry humphrey is a tool for letting a lot of the newer Js release, and tinker hatfield is definitely one of the most important designers nike has ever had (2 of my 4 favorite Js ever were completely designed by him, plus the older air maxes)

    but back to the article…..the cushioning material in the heel (looks like a fake version of puma superstructure) is definitely not anything nike has ever used (real spiz’ikes have max air soles just like the 3s and 4s, my favorite hatfield Js ever), so my money’s saying its fake.

22. d losored23 June 3rd, 2007 at 3:58 pm

    the uglyiest fakest shoes in the world

23. NINO's Jersey City NJ June 3rd, 2007 at 4:11 pm

    Of Course they ARE FAKE!!!
    Brand Jordan would never release Pics concept or Actual Sample!!! Very Shoddy at Best

24. A June 3rd, 2007 at 6:06 pm

    Those look like somebody made them out of Legos. If those arent fake and JB makes them, I’m going to stop collecting Jordans.

25. bee 1245 June 3rd, 2007 at 9:30 pm

    yea they look fake and quality look cheap i wont even get em if they really came out

26. omar_v June 3rd, 2007 at 9:55 pm

    how can you smile with a shoe that ugly????

27. 24=MVP June 8th, 2007 at 10:02 pm

    y would any1 think theyre the 23s??? theyre the UGLIEST $HIT EVER both of them. if it is i will kill myself and die along with the jordans they use to make because they r dead as well.

28. NIKE June 10th, 2007 at 11:12 pm

    No This Man Had Won Our Jordan Brand Contest and we are putting these shoes for the olympics in 2008.
    No THese Are Not Fake and They Are Not Called Spizike.
    They Are The Jordan XX3 PE Mars Blackmon Exclusive.

29. L.4.D.G. (Love 4 Da Game) June 11th, 2007 at 6:36 pm

    Those Asian companies are alway coping our American stuff. Dont believe me? Google a shoe company named “PEAK”.

30. Jean-Claude Van Damme June 18th, 2007 at 1:19 pm

    He does look like Jackie Chan!

31. Aundrey Wells July 1st, 2007 at 1:37 am

    THOSE ARE SOME OF THE FAKEST S***S I HAVE EVER SEEN!! THERE WOULD NEVER BE A TIME IN THE WORLD THAT I WILL SMILE WITH SOME OF THOSE B**CHES I RATHER WEAR SOME NON-NAME BRANDS SUCKA!!!!!!

32. connolly August 13th, 2007 at 9:49 pm

    wat are those. they are so fake . those are the fakes spizike i have ever seen it issad that all these stupid people think it is ok to do this and make fakes and then think it is cool any one how is like this ar retarteded stupid idiots and should be arested and go to jail forever and should be fined by michael jordan and getbroke. I HATE FAKES and the people that were them.

33. m$.bmo September 26th, 2007 at 10:31 am

    fake is written all over that sneaker.
    smh.

34. Trey Pope September 30th, 2007 at 10:27 am

    i think jb does need a new spizike concept since they decided to use so many colorways this year, but this is deffinately not the one. you were right about the netting and stuff, so i think these are fake.

35. KIM November 9th, 2007 at 4:57 pm

    LMFAO0!
    R U FUKIN SERiOUS!
    THOSE R SUPPOSE TO0 B SPiKES?! HAHAHA
    EWW THOSE SHYTS R SO0 FAKKEE!
    TRUST ME GUYS iMA FEiND WEN i SAY NO TO0 DiS iTS ENOUGH!

36. Richard Frost December 1st, 2007 at 6:00 am

    They are made by Qiao Dan, which is Chinese for Jordan and it is a Chinese Company, and they cost about 25-30 Dollars. And believe me for most Chinese that is still expensive, so dream on about them even dreaming about originals. But many love basketball and this is a great company while the country grows into the exploitative price markets of America and Europe. We Westerners are the fools, not the Chinese. I live in China now and i love the original Jordans, but i’ve just bought a pair of the above left, in Black and Grey and they are great, but I am not kidding myself they were made in a neighbouring factory, look a little smoother and cost a whole lot more-they are not originals, they are what they are!

37. Rich Gurl December 23rd, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    Those shoes are so damn ugly,they both are fakes, especially the red ones in the girl hand. Some dumbass will buy dem.

38. Lil balla December 27th, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    Nothin is faker dan dat picture its a fake

39. mr. poop February 9th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    no these shoes are so coolaruny

40. devaughn_jordan_king February 9th, 2008 at 5:39 pm

    I got every pair of j’s and i know fake when i see it and those are fake as hell.Look how big the blue net is.

41. mr. poop February 19th, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    butts are cool props to my k mart shoes

    k mart for life

    buns of steal

42. JAY WALKER April 6th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

    i actually like these shoes the blue 1s look alright. when are they coming out

43. someone that lives in Durham!!! May 16th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    those are the ugliest Jordans I have ever seen…the red ones look like some fukking reeboks…hell no those wouldnt even see my front door… can u say Ross or TJ Max???

44. dominican retro kidD!! June 5th, 2008 at 2:11 pm

    THIS SHIT IS VERY UGLY

45. dominican retro kidD!! June 5th, 2008 at 2:12 pm

    VERY FAKESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

46. dominican retro kidD!! June 5th, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    THOSE ARE FAKESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

47. kerry August 17th, 2008 at 4:36 pm

    fake ass shits

48. kerry August 17th, 2008 at 4:37 pm

    fake ass shits

    well atleast they tried

49. dopeboy jr September 24th, 2008 at 11:24 am

    u kno ima get dem blue boys

50. dj-spidermane December 5th, 2008 at 11:33 pm

    Let me start off by saying wat da f**k. These are fakes. First the back of the shoe where the vissible air sole unit is at is all wrong. Thats the the bottom of the air jordan retro 3. On the side of the that design by where the extra holes are is all wrong. That comes from the reto 4. It suspose to be the same design on the side of the retro 5. These kicks are a insalt to jordan brand, and nike, and me.